© 2024 WEMU
Serving Ypsilanti, Ann Arbor and Washtenaw County, MI
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Court to hear arguments on whether civil rights law covers LGBT

LGBT Pride
Wikipedia Media Commons
LGBT Pride

At issue is a 2018 Michigan Civil Rights Commission interpretation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. It says the state law protects LGBTQ people from discrimination in employment, housing, education and public accommodation. And that’s because the law includes the word “sex.”

“It’s not a long jump for the court to find that our Elliott-Larsen, which prohibits discrimination not only in employment, but housing and education and public accommodation, does protect LGBT people from discrimination in those areas,” said attorney Jay Kaplan of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, which is a party to the case.

“It’s a pivotal moment in what has been a very long fight to ensure Michigan’s LGBT community is protected from discrimination,” said Vicki Levengood is with the state civil rights department.

Levengood told Michigan Public Radio that position is also backed by federal court rulings, including a US Supreme Court decision.

A wedding venue and an electrolysis clinic are challenging the commission’s action. The owners say the commission’s determination would force them to violate their religious beliefs. And they say the interpretation doesn’t matter because the Legislature never voted to expand the state civil rights law to include LGBT protections.

“Our position is very clear,” said attorney David Kallman. “The civil rights commission is an un-elected body that does not have the authority to amend the state law, and they can’t unilaterally on their own change state law to add a protected class to state civil rights laws.”

The Republican-controlled Legislature has refused to expand the language of the civil rights law. Last year, Governor Gretchen Whitmer endorsed a legislative effort to enshrine LGBTQ protections in the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.


A link to the Michigan Supreme Court’s page on the case

The Michigan Civil Rights Commission’s interpretative statement

A link to the US Supreme Court’s Bostock v Clayton County decision

Non-commercial, fact based reporting is made possible by your financial support.  Make your donation to WEMU todayto keep your community NPR station thriving.

Like 89.1 WEMU on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Contact WEMU News at734.487.3363 or email us at studio@wemu.org

Rick Pluta is the managing editor for the Michigan Public Radio Network.
Related Content