Supporters of thebillssay they want to avoid what happened with funds from the 1998 settlement with tobacco companies.
That money was supposed to help states recoup the Medicaid costs of treating people with tobacco-related illnesses. But Michigan used much of the money for things other than health care such as scholarships and business incentives.
“And I assume what’s trying to be done here is to do better than that and not have this just sit as a slush fund out there for people to take for whatever they want to do that year but have it targeted on the opioid crisis,” said Republican Representative Graham Filler, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee.
Democratic Attorney General Dana Nesselshowed up to testify in support of the bills, and she urged lawmakers to act quickly.
“Time is not in our side when it comes to Michigan’s opioid epidemic,” she said. “Some 3,000 Michiganders lost their lives just last year to opioid overdoses.”
The bills were adopted by the oversight committeeand sent to the House floor with just one “no” vote.
Republican Representative Steven Johnson said there are already requirements on how the opioid settlement dollars can be spent.
“I guess I would wonder why we would add more restrictions on ourselves of things this could be spent on and let the wisdom of the Legislature as they go through the appropriations process to make that determination,” he said. "I guess, why would we unnecessarily hamstring ourselves?”
Non-commercial, fact based reporting is made possible by your financial support. Make your donation to WEMU todayto keep your community NPR station thriving.
Like 89.1 WEMU on Facebook and follow us on Twitter
Contact WEMU News at734.487.3363 or email us at studio@wemu.org
